Articles

Film Review: "Maison du Bonheur"

"MAISON DU BONHEUR" (Canada/France 2016) ***1/2
Directed by Sofia Bohdanowicz

Subjects of documentaries are often famous people, but only a handful have been about ordinary everyday unimportant folk.  MAISON DU BONHEUR (translated in English to House of Happiness), an occasionally brilliant film is one of the latter.

It was not that long ago in 1975 that Belgian director Chantal Akerman stunned audiences and critics around the world with her 3-hour long art house epic on the daily chores of a housewife.   The film was called 23, Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles.  Though a fictional film that ended with the female protagonist committing suicide as did the director herself  recently, the film repeatedly showed the protagonist eating and cooking not once but repeatedly.  Similarly, in MAISON DU BONHEUR, this one an hour long documentary, Torontonian director Sofia Bohdanowicz shows that the daily chores and thoughts of an ordinary person can be just as interesting as a celebrity.

The doc’s subject is Juliane Sellam is a 77-year-old Parisian astrologer who has lived in the same pre-war apartment in Montmartre for half a century.   In this vibrant documentary, Toronto director Sofia Bohdanowicz focuses on Sellam’s daily life over 30 beautifully shot segments, which are narrated by both Sellam and Bohdanowicz. 

When the film opens, Bohdanowicz (she is revealed as a very young filmmaker) is leaving Toronto to stay in Paris with a person she has never met - Juliane Sellam.  Thus she begins filming Sellam’s life, thoughts and musings.

The matriarch’s life and rich inner world crystallize through her daily rituals of making coffee, applying makeup, and caring for her geraniums. 

Bohdanowicz devotes 10 minutes or so on each ritual.  Sellam describes desiring coffee as a young girl.  Her aunt denies her a taste saying that young girls do not drink coffee.  Her grandmother gives her a taste which she loves, just because she was initially not allowed to have any.  Up to the present, Sallen says she has loved coffee.  Bohdanowicz brilliantly shows, on cue, the slow pouring of steaming coffee into a cup.   Sellam puts on make-up daily, even to just take out the rubbish.  She confesses that she wants to look the best for everyone and that no one needs to see an ugly person in the morning  She goes again to the origin of her love for make up.  Her uncle used to be a nail polish salesman and he lets her try his wide array of samples.  The shot of the samples with dozens of painted false nails on  a platter is something I and not seen for 30 years.  Her ritual with gernaniums is just as interesting.  She waters them either late at night or very early in the morning so that people below her flat will not get wet from the water above.  Bohdanowicz never fails to impress her audience with Sellam and her chores.  And her doc goes on…..

The film has a special engagement run at the TIFF Bell Lightbox with the director present for a Q & A on the films opening day.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bInvPokMFH4

Write comment (0 Comments)

Film Review: Angels Wear White

ANGELS WEAR WHITE (China/France 2017) Top 10 *****
Directed by Vivian Qu

 

(This film is not in French but it is a France co-production)

One of the best films I previewed at last year’s Toronto International Film Festival, ANGELS WEAR WHITE proves its excellence on second viewing.  This is writer/director Vivian Qu at her best, with her tense, relevant and powerful film of young female abuse.

Young women under pressure in a corrupt seaside town.  The question in Qu’s excellent study is whether one can hold on to ones dignity in the midst of such over-powering adversity.

One reason Qu’s film works so well is that she is able to get right into the skin of her characters’ emotions.  This tactic can be observed several times within only the film’s first 15 minutes.  When Mia (Vicky Chen) is first introduced, the audience sees her observing what appears to be a huge statue of Marylyn Monroe.  The camera never reveals the full statue, as if telling the audience that the height of her stays can never be reached.  Mia looks up and down as the camera follows her to her work in  a seedy seaside motel, where she is watering the plants.  What is going on in her head?  When she later watches the closed circuit camera on the goings-on in a motel room where two young schoolgirls are accosted for sex, the audience becomes a voyeur while at the same time wishing Mia would intervene.  A later argument at the hospital shows a vigorous argument taking place between the father and mother of one for the schoolgirls as she is being tested for her virginity.  Qu shoots the argument off screen where the audience can only hear (or read the subtitles) without seeing the actors, thus emphasizing the importance of the words.

Qu also captures the essence of Chinese society and all its corruptness.  The first is the higher ups, Commissioner Liu abusing his authority.  On a lower level, corruptness is still apparent.  Mia records a larger number of towels than actually taken to be washed to the daily laundry pick-up while she gets a kickback.  The school system is candidly shown with a school prefect stopping a fight and how students are chastised in the school system.  When Mia is questioned by the inspector on the illegal goings-on, she remains silent - typical of the Chinese way of say nothing, get into no trouble.  The inspector is also shown accepting a bribe from the hotel owner.

Female director Qu’s film has a strong female slant.  The main characters are female, most of them mistreated by their male counterparts.  When the male motel manager wants the truth out of Mia and the hotel receptionist as to what happened, he hoses them down with water.  Women have it bad.  “I don’t want to be re-born as a woman.”  That all-important line says to all, when Lily suffers the pain from hymen reconstruction (to show that she is still a virgin).

Qu’s film is beautifully shot by Belge cinematographer Benoît Dervaux.  There is one crystal clearly shot scene where Mia rides her motorbike in a drizzling rain, with no noticeable drops of water on the camera lens.

The film’s most prominent charter that only comes into the story half hour through the film is the female attorney Hao (Shi Ke).  This is a well written extremely strong character, brilliantly performed by Shi Ku.  Hao must be director Qu’s favourite character, judging from the way the camera tracks her movements.  Hao’s character is smart but most important is the fact that she is trustworthy and caring human being.  She gains the trust of school Wen (Zhou Meijun) enabling the investigation to progress.  This contrasts the male Inspector’s scare tactics.

Qu’s film is intriguing, suspenseful, occasionally exciting and emotional in all aspects.  The film’s main conquest is depicting the travails of women in a society so corrupt all all levels that there is little hope for all.  But still there is hope in a few that care like lawyer Hao. 

Young women user press ANGELS WEAR WHITE is a real knock-out! 

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LrXwXZQ5hY

 

 

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LrXwXZQ5hY

Write comment (0 Comments)

Film Review: Belle de Jour

"BELLE DE JOUR" (France 1968) ****

Directed by Luis Bunuel

"BELLE DE JOUR" begins innocently with a open horse carriage moving leisurely in the countryside driven by two horsemen.  The camera reveals a couple (Jean Sorel and Catherine Deneuve) seated at the back exchanging love talk.  “I love you so much,” and the retort, “I love you more.”  But when he kisses her, he finds her very cold.  The carriage is stopped and he drags her to a tree and strings her up to be whipped by the two horsemen.  Why this sudden brutality?

It is a disturbing sequence that turns out to be a nightmare as the girl wakes up in bed with her apparent husband.

The film returns to the main life of the couple, Severine and her husband Pierre, a surgeon.  It turns out that she is frigid in their sexual relationship though she is turned on sexually by other things.  The film hints that the problem could have arisen from sexual abuse when she was a child.  Severin is accosted by her husband’s friend, Husson (Michel Piccoli) who is described as rich and idle, his two weaknesses.  Severine spurns his advances.

Two things make BELLE DE JOUR intriguing.  One is the mystery element.  Director Bunuel plays on the audience’s curiosity, or sexual curiosity, which is even more powerful.  Severine learns of a girl Henriette who sells herself as a whore at a nearby house, which eventually prompts her to become the BELLE DE JOUR, a woman of the day as she sells her services during the day instead of the night.  The other element is Bunuel’s expertise at surrealism.  Bunuel famous for his surreal films like L’AGE DOR, THE DISCREET CHARM OF THE BOURGEOISIE and THE PHANTOM OF LIBERTY plays this film where reality seems a fantasy and vice versa.  The sexual favours desired by Belle de Jour’s clients are not always involving intercourse.  One sequence has the client get off with his face being stepped on by his girl.  The very idea of a very bored housewife (Deneuve) serving clients every afternoon is in itself quite surreal.

There is much to fascinate besides the film’s sexual content.  One is the study of the characters, why each behave the way they do.  The other is the period piece, set in the past when one assumes sex is more controlled.  Which is not the case.

Deneuve looks totally glamorous as her wardrobe was designed by none other than Yves Saint Laurent.

BELLE DE JOUR shot many of its actors to fame, not to mention Catherine Deneuve.  Pierre Clementi won recognition as the extremely jealous gangster client, Marcel and went on to work after this film with the world’s best directors.  He is unforgettable in Bertolucci’s THE CONFORMIST.  Michel Piccoli again plays the role of another weirdo.

Not to give away any spoilers, the tim has many twists in the story including a happy fantasy-type ending that should please audiences. 

BELLE DE JOUR would have likely been seen already by many a cinephile.  But it is still interesting a watch a second time around as one-to-one can not be expected to remember everything about the film.  BELLE DE JOUR is re-released in a 4K restoration print for a special  engagement run beginning this week at the TIFF Bell Lightbox.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5oqTzcpfZw

Write comment (0 Comments)

Film Review: Gauguin

GAUGUIN (France 2017) ***
Directed by Édouard Deluc

For those unfamiliar, GAUGUIN is a famous talented French painter of the 19th century.  But Paul GAUGUIN (Vincent Cassel) was a dissatisfied painter tired of the so-called civilized world and its political, moral and artistic conventions.  So he leaves his wife and children to travel to Tahiti, Polynesia on the other side of the world with little money.

For those not well versed in Geography, Tahiti is right in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, plunked right in the middle of lots and lots of water, far away from nowhere.  It is a beautiful place with white sandy beaches (check your Google map) but the country is large enough to nurse a huge jungle.  The cinematography is never too shy to show the beauty of the island.  There are lots of gorgeous landscapes on display with shots of green, rivers, mountains an beaches.  Indeed, it would be a worthwhile place to visit for a naturalistic vacation.  Tahiti is where Gauguin is headed, consumed with a yearning for original purity, and ready to sacrifice everything for his quest. 

Those who criticize me know nothing of an artist’s nature.  These are the words of Gauguin s he rides his horse into the jungle with barely enough provisions for a few days. Impoverished with diabetes, and solitary, Gauguin pushes deep into the Tahitian jungle, where he meets the Maoris and Tehura, his muse, who will inspire his most iconic works of art.  Tehura becomes Gauguin’s wife.  In real life, Tehura was only 13, which means that Gauguin would be stamped a pedophile in today’s standards.

The film traces the two years of Gauguin’s life in Tahiti, which is inspired by Noa Noa (meaning Fragrance) , the travel diary Gauguin wrote after his first trip to Tahiti in 1893.

Deluc’s biography is even in its pacing with no high points with a few dramatized events - the only one or two involving Gauguin’s painting like the difficulty of finding a canvas and the confrontation with his wife Tehura on hi suspicion of her being unfaithful.  Still this charged scene is conducted with restraint.  Deluc trivializes Gauguin’s sickness.  Gauguin is never shown really sick only perhaps a bit of coughing and grumbling about his energy.  But in real life, he did live till he ripe age of 54.

Vincent Cassel inhabits the role of Gauguin, delivering a steering performance showing the artist at his ugliest, unkempt, often sick and tired.  Cassel used to be a hunk and  heartthrob in his younger days with his stunning good-looks and great body as in films like BROTHERHOOD OF THE WOLF and READ MY LIPS.  His age is showing in recent films like MESRINE and GAUGUIN but he continually to do outstanding work, staring out as one of France’s greatest and most under-rated actors.  His chiseled body is still observable many a film’s scene where he has his top off.

GAUGUIN is a no-nonsense biography, told straight forward from start to finish, but praising the artist for more than his worth as a human being.  Nothing is also mentioned with his relationship with his wife and kids when he returned to France.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HiCzb2gWo0

Write comment (0 Comments)

Récent - Latest Posts

More in Cinéma - Movies  

Recherche

Sur Instagram